How Wild Tech works
Wild Tech has a simple division of labor. A human sets the rules and makes every editorial call. An AI pipeline does the legwork, under those rules. You deserve to know exactly who does what.
Human editorial direction
The editor of Wild Tech is Nicolás Galindez. He defines the editorial criteria. He decides what gets covered and what gets discarded. He reviews and approves every piece before it is published. Nothing is auto-published. Ever.
The criteria are strict. We only cover machines and tools you can buy today. We discard vaporware. We treat unmeasured specs as what they are: manufacturer claims, and we label them that way. Every number must have a source. Limitations get the same weight as results. A banned-vocabulary list keeps marketing language out. When something needs correcting after publication, we correct it in public, with a visible changelog.
AI-assisted execution
Under those rules, an AI research pipeline does the heavy work, twice a week. It sweeps primary sources: manufacturers, datasheets, measured reviews, field trials. It scores every candidate topic. It drafts each piece. It runs a QA pass against the editorial rules. Then, and only then, the draft reaches the editor.
What we never do
We never invent numbers. Missing data is labeled
DATA NOT AVAILABLE FROM SOURCE. We never cite AI-generated
content farms. We never use fake bylines: pieces are produced by the
pipeline and approved by the editor, and that is exactly what we tell you.
We never sell a verdict. Affiliate links exist, and they are always
disclosed. If the best product in a category has no affiliate program, we
recommend it anyway.
The rule that defines us: SHIPPING ONLY
We don't rewrite press releases — we check them. If it isn't on the market, it isn't in Wild Tech. One exception: each Radar may include a single item marked "on the horizon". No concepts. No renders. No "coming 2027".